. . would you rather be poor in a poor country or poor in a rich country?

Reading an article by Morrison Wong about post-1965 Asian immigrants to the United States brought about this question.

It outlined the normal highlights of higher education and higher income of Asian's in the United States. However, unlike most articles that only give Southeast Asians an honorary mention in a paragraph or so, Wong mentioned Southeast Asians in every one of his highlights and even explained these constrasts in an extensive conclusion.

Asians are usually more educated than average Americans.
Not Southeast Asians.

Asians generally make more money than the average Americans.
Not Southeast Asians.

Asians have tight ethnic enclaves to support them, unlike the Average Americans.
Not Southeast Asians.

Asians have lower fertility rates than the average Americans.
Not Southeast Asians.

More than half of Asians own houses.
Not Southeast Asians.

These past ten months here in Thailand has made me almost feel as if working internationally in developing countries is where I want to be. Now I'm not so sure.

Whats worst. Would you rather be in a developing country with no real hope of first rate opportunities or be in a developed country with no real chance of first rate opportunities? In a developing country, sometimes it's okay to be poor because everyone else is also. However, in a developed country and you're poor, you get to sit on the sidewalk in some metropolitan city and watch all the hotshots walking to work in their suits carrying their briefcases. What hits you more. Being apart of the developing world or being apart of the developed world but sitting on the side as only a second class citizen? Someone without access to the healthcare. Someone without access to the education. Someone without access to the labor rights. Someone without access to the high standard of living.

Whats worst? Not having the opportunity or seeing the opportunity just within your grasp?

I dont know.

International Relations / Humanitarian Rights? Public Interests?

Racializing of the Virginia Tech Shootings

Racializing of the Virginia Tech Shootings

Today, my co-worker, Maliwan, mentioned to me how it must be so hard to be an Asian student in the states now – post Virginia Tech… which got me into this talk about Asians and Asian Americans in higher education and blah blah blah…

The following discussion does not in anyway mean that I agree with or support the actions that were taken by Cho Seung-Hui on the Virginia Tech campus on 17 April 2007. As a college student and as a person, my heart goes out to the students, friends, and families of the victims who have had to suffer as a result of this massacre.

What do I do not agree with, however, is the way in which the media is presenting and spinning the coverage of this incident both during and especially after the massacre.

I was sitting in the Behavioral Medicine reception office of Bumrungrad International Hospital (the most “high-so” or bougie private hospital in Bangkok) when I first heard about the incident.

I’ve come to the conclusion that anything with “international” on it in Thailand means that not only is it catered to rich foreigners, but is one instance in which illustrates very clearly the wealth disparity that exists here in Bangkok.

The waiting room had a flat screen television that was turned to CNN and on it was a man who was on the scene of the massacre. The reporter caught my attention with his zealous tone of voice speaking of the worst school shooting in history.

Great, I thought. As if people around the world didn’t already think Americans were overly violent and America as already extremely unsafe.

Then my attention was drawn when the reporter started talking about the shooter. An Asian student from South Korea.

Even better. Now it’ll be even harder to for foreign exchange students who are trying to enjoy the pleasures of living, learning, and experiencing another culture and environment.

But later I found that, yes, the shooter was from South Korea. But his family lived in Virginia. His sister a graduate from Princeton. Him, an English major at Virginia Tech.

Great. He’s practically Asian American. Well, he’s as Asian American as my sister and believe me, Malisa is pretty American.

One of the biggest issues I’ve encountered living and traveling through Asia is that I’m never seen as western. Never seen as a “Genuine” American. Always catch people by surprise by my “wonderful English.”

While the media emphasizes that Cho Seung-Hui is a non-American born college student in the United States… it wasn’t his non-American-ness or Korean-ness that drove him to do what he did. It was growing up and living in America… as an American.

While the media emphasizes that Cho Seung-Hui is Asian and NOT American (in the sense that he was NOT born here)… it only reinforces the problems of being a perpetual foreigner that hangs over people of color in the states. Whether we were born in the U.S. or not, there will always be the assumption that we are not really American. We don’t belong. And maybe we’re just Cho Seung-Hui… another Asian kid in the states trying so hard to fit in by using academic excellence that we’re really just some ticking time bomb.

In any case. I really wouldn’t know how difficult it is to be an Asian college student in the states right now. But looking through facebook and the wave of groups that have sprung up denouncing Cho Seung-Hui as not representative of Asians… not representative of Koreans… etc. It looks like there is yet another issue to divide us in the already too fractured APA or API community.